Stress, Cancer And HIV
October 2007 - A review of research into the relationship between stress and disease
commissioned by the Institute of Medicine and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association has
found that stress is a contributing factor particularly in triggering or worsening depression, cardiovascular disease
and speeding progression of HIV/AIDS. Sheldon Cohen and Denise Janicki-Deverts both from Carnegie Mellon University,
together with Gregory E. Miller of the University of British Columbia also considered underlying behavioral and
Sheldon Cohen, the Robert E. Doherty professor of psychology explained:
"The majority of people confronted with even traumatic events remain disease-free. Stress increases
your risk of developing disease, but it doesn't mean that just because you are exposed to stressful events, you are
going to get sick."
The authors found the strongest evidence came from research on depression, which found stress
associated both with onset and relapse of the illness. Social stressors such as divorce and bereavement were
particularly significant. They also found that depression is common among people who have been diagnosed with a
serious illness and suggest that physical disease itself is stressful and can lead to depression. Chronic stress
(such as that experienced at work) was found to contribute to cardiovascular illnesses such as coronary heart
The authors concluded that studies on the relationship between stress and HIV/AIDS have produced
less clear findings, but since 2000 have consistently demonstrated an association with progression of AIDS. They
suggest this may be a result of complex and demanding drug treatments and could affect compliance. They also noted
that autonomic nervous system changes caused by stress may influence virus replication.
The authors commented:
"Individuals differ with regard to rate of progression through the successive phases of HIV infection.
Some remain asymptomatic for extended periods and respond well to medical treatment, whereas others progress
rapidly to AIDS onset, and suffer numerous complications and opportunistic infections. Stress may account for
some of this variability in HIV progression."
The authors suggest two possible pathways for the association between stress and disease: behavioral
(such as lack of sleep, exercise, and treatment compliance, poor nutrition, increased smoking) and endocrinal
(release of hormones that influence other biological processes, including the immune system).
The authors said:
"Effects of stress on regulation of immune and inflammatory processes have the potential to influence
depression, infectious, autoimmune, and coronary artery disease, and at least some (e.g. viral) cancers."
They found inconsistent results in studies of the role of stress in cancer and highlight a number of
difficulties in this field: delays in diagnosis; imprecision in measuring progression; an association may only be
found in cancers influenced by sustained hormonal response and impaired immunity.
Sheldon Cohen concluded:
"We will need additional studies across a broader range of cancers before we can fairly evaluate
the role of stress in cancer."
A survey of more than 6000 American adults published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
found that a substantial number held fatalistic beliefs about cancer and were more likely to ignore preventive advice
concerning exercise, quitting smoking and healthy nutrition. The study analyzed data from the National Cancer
Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey, the first for almost 20 years to assess knowledge about
and attitudes toward cancer prevention.
Jeff Niederdeppe, Ph.D., professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison said:
"Many Americans seem to feel afraid and helpless in regards to cancer, which may be exacerbated by
conflicting news reports and a general lack of education on the causes and prevention of cancer. They say 'well,
there is nothing much you can do about it' and, as our survey shows, they indeed do nothing about it."
The survey asked participants for their response to three statements about cancer. About 47 per cent agreed that "It seems like almost everything causes cancer," while 27 per cent agreed that "There's not much people can do to lower their chances of getting cancer." Nearly three quarters (71.5 per cent) agreed that "There are so many recommendations about preventing cancer it's hard to know which ones to follow."
Respondents who held at least one of these beliefs were less likely to exercise weekly and eat five daily servings of fruits and vegetables. Those who believed that "it's hard to know which recommendations to follow" were more likely to smoke. The report explains that all three beliefs were associated with lower levels of education.
The report concludes that there has been little progress in changing the belief that "everything causes cancer" despite increased availability of information over the last 20 years. While not specifically investigating the impact of media coverage on fatalistic beliefs about cancer, the report suggests that constantly changing and sometimes conflicting messages may be contributing to public confusion and what is needed is simple, straightforward education about preventive measures.
Jeff Niederdeppe commented:
"Cancer is a difficult thing to talk about in the space of a single news story. Science values repetition, while the media values novelty. Those two concepts naturally butt heads, which can confuse people."
A report from the American Cancer Society estimates that 2007 saw over 12 million
new cancer cases and 7.6 million cancer deaths (about 20,000 a day) worldwide. Of these, 5.4 million cases and 2.9
million deaths occurred in economically developed countries, compared to 6.7 million cases and 4.7 million deaths in
New developments in breast cancer imaging, timing of chemotherapy, and vaccine research
may offer innovative non-surgical interventions resulting in significant changes to current screening and treatment
practice and improvements in patient care.
New research suggests that significant differences in cancer rates between northern and southern
Europeans may be explained by the anti-cancer effects of olive oil in the diet.
Radiation therapy and chemotherapy administered concurrently after
lumpectomy helps prevent local reoccurrence of breast cancer.
A joint initiative between computer scientists at the University of Edinburgh and cellular biologists at the
Riken Genomic Research Centre in Japan may result in improved drug treatments for breast cancer sufferers that
will also minimize side effects.
A new study concludes that most patients who
undergo gastric cancer staging by lymph node sampling have inadequate assessments that